Discussing the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East

Discussing the risk perception of MNCs into the Middle East

Blog Article

Studies claim that the prosperity of multinational companies in the Middle East hinges not just on monetary acumen, but in addition on understanding and integrating into regional cultures.

This social dimension of risk management calls for a change in how MNCs run. Conforming to local traditions is not just about being familiar with company etiquette; it also involves much deeper social integration, such as understanding regional values, decision-making styles, and the societal norms that affect business practices and worker conduct. In GCC countries, successful business relationships are made on trust and personal connections rather than just being transactional. Additionally, MNEs can benefit from adjusting their human resource administration to reflect the social profiles of regional employees, as variables affecting employee motivation and job satisfaction vary widely across countries. This calls for a shift in mind-set and strategy from developing robust monetary risk management tools to investing in cultural intelligence and regional expertise as consultants and attorneys such Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah would likely suggest.

Much of the present academic work on risk management strategies for multinational corporations features particular uncertainties but omits uncertainties that are hard to quantify. Certainly, a lot of research in the worldwide administration field has focused on the management of either political risk or foreign currency exchange uncertainties. Finance and insurance coverage literature emphasises the danger factors for which hedging or insurance coverage instruments are developed to mitigate or transfer a firm's risk visibility. But, recent studies have brought some fresh and interesting insights. They have sought to fill area of the research gaps by giving empirical information about the risk perception of Western multinational corporations and their management strategies at the company level within the Middle East. In one research after collecting and analysing data from 49 major international companies which are have extensive operations in the GCC countries, the authors discovered the following. Firstly, the risk connected with foreign investments is obviously more multifaceted compared to usually cited variables of political risk and exchange rate visibility. Cultural danger is perceived as more important than political risk, financial risk, and economic risk. Secondly, even though aspects of Arab culture are reported to have a strong influence on the business environment, most firms find it difficult to adapt to regional routines and traditions.

Regardless of the political uncertainty and unfavourable economic climates in certain elements of the Middle East, international direct investment (FDI) in the area and, specially, into the Arabian Gulf has been steadily increasing over the past two decades. The relevance of the Middle East and Gulf markets is growing for FDI, and the associated risk seems to be important. Yet, research on the risk perception of multinationals in the area is lacking in volume and quality, as specialists and solicitors like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would probably attest. Although different empirical research reports have examined the effect of risk on FDI, many analyses have been on political risk. However, a brand new focus has appeared in current research, shining a spotlight on an often-overlooked aspect namely cultural factors. In these revolutionary studies, the researchers remarked that businesses and their administration frequently seriously neglect the impact of cultural facets as a result of not enough knowledge regarding cultural variables. In fact, some empirical research reports have unearthed that cultural differences lower the performance of international enterprises.